Steven
Hanley
About
email: sjh@svana.org
web: https://svana.org/sjh
twitter: https://twitter.com/sjhmtb
instagram: https://instagram.com/sjhmtb
Other online diaries:
Aaron Broughton,
Andrew Pollock,
Anthony Towns,
Chris Yeoh,
Martijn van Oosterhout,
Michael Davies,
Michael Still,
Tony Breeds,
Links:
Linux Weekly News,
XKCD,
Girl Genius,
Planet Linux Australia,
Bilbys,
CORC,
Canberra Weather: forecast, radar.
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 |
| Months | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jan | Feb | Mar |
| Apr | May | Jun |
| Jul | Aug | Sep |
| Oct | Nov | Dec |
Categories:
- amusing - 37
- comp - 143
- blogging - 6
- blosxom - 12
- design - 5
- email - 7
- hardware - 37
- internet - 14
- ip - 4
- linux - 22
- prog - 2
- schwag - 2
- software - 17
- lca - 56
- leisure - 120
- books - 13
- food - 51
- holiday - 2
- music - 25
- screen - 21
- theatre - 5
- mtb - 438
- events - 113
- gear - 94
- various - 318
- ilmiwac - 38
- milkcarton - 21
- work - 5
- June 2018 (1)
- December 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (4)
- May 2016 (1)
- November 2015 (21)
- September 2014 (2)
- May 2014 (1)
- July 2013 (1)
- May 2013 (2)
- December 2012 (5)
- December 2011 (31)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (5)
- June 2011 (4)
- May 2011 (5)
- April 2011 (4)
- March 2011 (3)
- February 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (8)
- December 2010 (3)
- November 2010 (11)
- October 2010 (4)
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (4)
- July 2010 (5)
- June 2010 (5)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (6)
- March 2010 (4)
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (9)
- December 2009 (4)
- November 2009 (7)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (7)
- August 2009 (12)
- July 2009 (8)
- June 2009 (8)
- May 2009 (14)
- April 2009 (6)
- March 2009 (8)
- February 2009 (7)
- January 2009 (13)
- December 2008 (9)
- November 2008 (12)
- October 2008 (7)
- September 2008 (10)
- August 2008 (7)
- July 2008 (11)
- June 2008 (14)
- May 2008 (30)
- April 2008 (20)
- March 2008 (12)
- February 2008 (8)
- January 2008 (7)
- December 2007 (7)
- November 2007 (11)
- October 2007 (9)
- September 2007 (7)
- August 2007 (7)
- July 2007 (23)
- June 2007 (6)
- May 2007 (17)
- April 2007 (7)
- March 2007 (9)
- February 2007 (7)
- January 2007 (26)
- December 2006 (7)
- November 2006 (10)
- October 2006 (11)
- September 2006 (12)
- August 2006 (16)
- July 2006 (9)
- June 2006 (12)
- May 2006 (23)
- April 2006 (17)
- March 2006 (16)
- February 2006 (13)
- January 2006 (23)
- December 2005 (13)
- November 2005 (20)
- October 2005 (14)
- September 2005 (27)
- August 2005 (34)
- July 2005 (28)
- June 2005 (30)
- May 2005 (12)
- April 2005 (17)
- March 2005 (28)
- February 2005 (38)
- January 2005 (29)
- December 2004 (33)
- November 2004 (38)
- October 2004 (15)
- September 2004 (25)
Wed, 30 Apr 2008
Searching for a surface - 22:22
If the camel
disappears there is an obvious need for a surface on which to place objects in
a gravitatively agreeable direction. Where do we find such a surface I wonder,
this may call for some more scientific testing. Get one random object, such as
a keg of beer (though of course if you want higher beer volume, you may want a
shopping
trolley full of beer cans, and really, don't we always want more
beer on our websites) or a
former prime minister (crash test dummy Howard), or the number 17, according
to a math lecturer I had that is the ultimate random number.
That 17 is not an object and instead some quasi thought based construct or something should not deter us, after all the camel was there in the first place simply so we had somewhere obvious and natural to place a blog. This of course brings us to the question of how we can place these random objects, if they are truly random (which brings up problems related to the need for a RNG and some source of real entropy) wont placing them in some order just mess that up. The question of where we place things once the camel escapes is also in need of consideration.
Scientific testing of various new and unknown locations that are more or less not camels will be needed. A table is one such item on which we can place things. A large body of water, such as the pacific ocean is another such object. This has the added bonus that some objects may or may not float. Also some objects may or may not be eaten by sharks, giant squid or a Grue. All these eventualities bring a number of opportunities for betting on outcomes, though if doing so wastes as much paper as the damn form guides that appear in newspapers too often we may need to give up and give the ants a chance at society.
I wonder if a society of ants would have people farms, who knows maybe they already do?
